there is some thing in life that don't work or that shouldn't be trusted.
the first are springs
the second is hillarys management and fsm's.
not so long ago I had a fsm(i say this loosely)mrs keenas called him a pr*t,still she calls them all pr*ts.she has a way with words does my dearest.
anyway the said prat accused me of double dealing and would put me on stop if he found out i was,he only apologizing when I came back at him that I wasn't .
now I don't know what the rest of you think or feel about web-blinds but in my mind this amounts to double dealing and is nothing more than hypocrisy.still what do you expect from a bunch of twa*s
Never had any problem with springs, but usually have to adjust the tension + or - to suit the customer.
On double dealing, received an e-mail from FSM today, actually 2, but cocked up the 1st by not attaching the weekly stats. Mmmm maybe it wasn't a thingy up. However the 2nd e-mail also had a document attached on double dealing or poor performing agents. Text follows:-
------- text starts --------
REPLACING DOUBLE DEALERS AND POOR PERFORMERS
DOUBLE DEALERS
Ways to investigate double dealing include: checking product mix; poor conversion; no quotes being lodged; telephone research with customers who haven't ordered; checking payment records; liaising with credit control.
Process for Replacing
* Communicate with credit control to discuss plans and keep track of their account.
* If possible reduce the number of leads to advisor gradually.
* This may require recruiting to replace or re-distributing leads.
* Once their credit control account is up to date and capacity is in place - put advisor on commission stop.
* Have meeting with advisor in public place (i.e. hotel) with one other colleague (RSM or FSM)
* Involve solicitors if necessary (i.e. Formal letter)
* Have a list of any outstanding fits and collect blinds relating to these.
* Collect other paperwork such as customer details, invoices, order forms, sample kit etc.
* Feed back to credit control/debt recovery.
POOR PERFORMERS
The objection is to cease the relationship between Hillarys and Advisors on best terms possible to reduce service calls, re-makes, and debt issues.
Process for Replacing
Providing you have already spent time with advisors and provided them with training (i.e. Dogs)
* Have a meeting of concern with advisor.
* In meeting refer to the facts: what we invest in them; their results; the training we have provided etc.
* Agree what needs to change for advisor business to continue
* Provide a time frame for the advisor to achieve these goals (no more than 2 weeks) and book 2nd meeting.
* Reduce leads within this time frame by recruitment or re-distribution of leads.
* Have 2nd meeting once this time has lapsed.
* Provide written notice of termination and agree plans with advisor for outstanding fits.
* If you are concerned about advisor completing fits - liaise with credit control and put advisor on commission stop until all fits are completed.
* Feed back to credit control.
-----------text ends -----------
Of concern under poor performers is they give agents 2 weeks to improove, but reduce agents leads. Well, that is really going to improve performance, ain't it!